Welcome To Nature Cons

Come join Americans who are outraged with the eco-terrorists and the green revolution  threatening to take over this country.
We will not stay silent as faux environmental groups threaten our way of life, with their  outrageous conservation proposals to dominate America through U.N. Agenda 21. Who is responsible for this unconstitutional act?  In 1992 George H.W. Bush signed the document at the Earth Summit, committing the United States to the U.N. regulations of Agenda 21, which will effectively end our national sovereignty, property rights and our current way of life.

With Executive order # 12852 President Clinton created the Presidents Council on  Sustainable Development to integrate U.S. environmental policy with the U.N. regulations. Among the signing members of this council were former President and  CEO of Nature Conservancy, John Sawhill, Michele Perrault, International VP -  
Sierra Club, John Adams, Natural Resources Defense Council and Ken Lay
former  head of Enron Corp.
For all of the corrupt bankers, corporations, scientists, academicians, legislators and members of the local, state and federal government, who are involved in this scheme  - you have seriously underestimated the resolve of the American people. We are mad as hell - and taking it no longer.
You've successfully hidden your plan for years, but 'We The People' are becoming more aware with each passing day
 and as Admiral Yamimoto (Commander-in-Chief of Japanese fleet who attacked Pearl Harbor) stated over 60 years ago - "We have awakened a sleeping giant". 
So to The Nature Conservancy (TNC) - World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council and all other conservation groups and non-governmental organizations who comprise the eco/fascist communitarian enemies of America
we know  your intentions and will expose you at every level.
We are not the controlled main stream media and we will not stay silent.
We will not go quietly into the night.

The constant propaganda we are forced to endure, on a daily basis, insinuating we are too ignorant to take care of our earth is not only insulting and condescending, is it blatantly untrue.

Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife fund have arrogantly presented themselves as the only hope for saving the earth, from the false crisis they have introduced.  
They conveniently forget to mention they have surrounded themselves with some of the worst polluters in the world.  Sixteen of the twenty six members of the TNC International Leadership Council have made the Political Economic Research Institute (PERI) top 100 worst polluters list and 12 of them are multiple offenders.

Former President of World Wildlife Fund International is the trophy hunting, eugenist Prince Philip of England. His son, Prince Charles, now holds the  title and is well documented for his love of fox hunting, private jets, vast land holdings, and lavish life style. Yet hypocrite Prince Charles constantly informs us our 'age of convenience must be over'.
We also have Queen Elizabeth, who is subtly pressuring the world to adapt to the false environmental crisis.
Interestingly, what is not made public is Queen Elizabeth's $6 billion interest in her Rio Tinto uranium mines.
The Queen is also complicit in the use of 'depleted uranium' through her connections with the Bush family, Cheney and Halliburton.
The use of depleted uranium has been called "The Worst Environmental Disaster in the World" and was unleashed on an unknowing public in the First Gulf War, by George H. W. Bush and supported by England's Queen Elizabeth.  With a half shelf life of 4 billion years, both the U.S. and U.K. military have contaminated the entire earth with this heinous material.
There are also  the nuclear toxins released from the Fukishima disaster to poison our atmosphere - but
The silence we hear from the environmental groups on these 'real threats' is deafening.

They Want America To Fail

Is Agenda 21 of the United Nations Operating in Your Backyard?
By Jim Frazier
Posted by editor@greeleygazette.com•
April 27, 2010

"Where did “Agenda 21” come from? Who created Agenda 21? American’s did not. Congress did not vote on the document with 44 chapters and hundreds of provisions on how to ‘save the earth’ from mankind. The document was created in 1992 at the Earth Summit, by Canadian businessman Maurice Strong and strongly supported by England’s Prince Phillip and Prince Charles. “European royalty and especially the British Monarchy are at the center of the Agenda 21 movement,” said Shaw. The monarchist concepts of government in Agenda 21 can be tied back to Prince Charles who established a council for sustainable development long before the Earth Summit. It can be tied back his socialistic Fabian Society.” Shaw said that the connection between European monarchies and multi-national companies is very clear and essential to bringing about the plan for a New World Order. The plan includes a one-world banking system centered in Germany, and a world government with all national governments, including the USA, under rule of the United Nations."
Full Article Here

Scientists use the Climate Change Scam to introduce Human Engineering

Engineering Humans: A New Solution to Climate Change?
Wynne Parry, LiveScience Senior Writer
Date: 29 March 2012 Time: 11:00 AM ET

So far, conventional solutions to global warming — new government policies and changes in individual behavior — haven't delivered. And more radical options, such as pumping sulfur into the atmosphere to counteract warming, pose a great deal of risk.


There may be another route to avoid the potentially disastrous effects of climate change: We can deliberately alter ourselves, three researchers suggest.

Human engineering, as they call it, poses less danger than altering our planet through geo-engineering, and it could augment changes to personal behavior or policies to mitigate climate change, they write in an article to be published in the journal Ethics, Policy and the Environment.
Full Article Here

Gore is an inconvenient greenie

Flashback April 2009: Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing

Marc Morano – Climate Depot
April 23, 2009

Washington, DC -- UK's Lord Christopher Monckton, a former science advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, claimed House Democrats have refused to allow him to appear alongside former Vice President Al Gore at a high profile global warming hearing on Friday April 24, 2009 at 10am in Washington. Monckton told Climate Depot that the Democrats rescinded his scheduled joint appearance at the House Energy and Commerce hearing on Friday. Monckton said he was informed that he would not be allowed to testify alongside Gore when his plane landed from England Thursday afternoon.

“The House Democrats don't want Gore humiliated, so they slammed the door of the Capitol in my face,” Monckton told Climate Depot in an exclusive interview. “They are cowards.”

Monckton's Report: 35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore's movie 

Monckton's Letter to Representatives Ed Markey & Joe Barton - March 30, 2009

Lord Monckton Declared Victor in Global Warming Debate – By His Opponent! – August 19, 2008

Rio +20 Earth Summit will tie population into green knots
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh
January 12, 2012

The United Nations is not giving up its assault on the economic and political future of our country and of our planet. The first installment of the United Nations to control the globe environmentally and economically was “The UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED),” held in Rio in 1992. The UN Bruntland Commission released its official UN Agenda 21 that same year, following the Conference on Human Settlements in 1976 and the 1987 report, “Our Common Future.”

The policy of Sustainable Development, land use, education, population control and reduction, made nature and its protection the central principle for all member nations.

The 65-page socialist document released from the Conference on Human Settlements (1976) declared private land ownership and wealth as primary reasons for “social injustice.” Its recommendations that were later incorporated in UN Agenda 21 are:

Redistribution of population according to resources
Government control of land use in order to achieve equitable distribution of resources
Land use control through zoning and planning
Government control of excessive profits from land use
Urban and rural land control through public land ownership
Developing rights must be held by public authorities

The next episode of the saga will play again in Brazil—“Rio +20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development,” twenty years later. The 19-page draft was released on January 10, 2012 under the title, “The Future We Want.” Who is “WE?”

The 40 chapters of the U.N. Agenda 21 signed in 1992 in Rio is not really a treaty, “It is a soft-law document.” The nations whose representatives signed the document were “morally obligated to implement them, according to the United Nations.” (Henry Lamb)

The United States, represented by George Bush, and 178 other nations signed the document that proposed regulations, organizations, and practices that limit the economic behavior of citizens, organizations, and firms with regard to water use, land use, transfer of technology, and human habitation under global governance.

Because the recommendations were not legally binding, strongly suggested regulations were implemented administratively, bypassing Congress. Congress has not debated nor adopted UN Agenda 21, yet certain provisions have been included in law from time to time.

The full Senate scheduled a vote after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed the Convention on Biological Diversity by a vote of 16-3 on June 29, 1994. One hour before the vote, the “treaty” was pulled from the schedule. (Henry Lamb)

President Clinton signed Executive Order 12852, creating the President’s Council on Sustainable Development to translate UN Agenda 21 into U.S. public policy called “ecosystem management,” administered by the federal government.

The President’s Council created “Sustainable America” with 16 “we believe” statements. The ultimate goals were to abolish private property, control education, control and reduce population, and control the economy. Currently, every federal government agency has a sustainable UN Agenda 21 plan. (fedcenter.gov)

In June 20-22, 2012, participants will sign on to 10 new sustainable development goals for the planet and promise to build a global green economy in order to reduce consumption and poverty. (The Guardian)

Countries will have to agree to protect oceans against overfishing, publish and approve an annual state of the planet report, subscribe to a single world agency for the environment, and appoint a Global High Commissioner for Future Generations or “ombudsperson.”

Stephen Hale, Oxfam’s deputy advocacy and campaigns director, wants the Rio negotiations to develop “concrete proposals on sustainable agriculture and food security.”

Ruth Davis, chief policy advisor of Greenpeace, UK, wants an end to “the wild-west plundering of the high seas.” Might she be referring to Somali pirates? Joking aside, she believes the ocean population has been depleted. I still marvel how they can count creatures per cubic foot when they are constantly in motion.

The Obama administration wants to ratify “The Convention on the Law of the Sea.” Member nations surrender sovereignty over their territorial seas when they voluntarily agree to act according to the treaty and “other rules of international law.” (Henry Lamb)

“The sovereignty over the territorial sea is exercised subject to this Convention and to other rules of international law.” (Article 2, (3))The UN bemoans in its Rio +20 draft the setbacks in food insecurity, climate change, biodiversity loss, the existence of 1.4 billion people who live in extreme poverty and one-sixth under-nourished, pandemics, and epidemics. “Unsustainable development has increased the stress on the earth’s limited natural resources and on the carrying capacity of ecosystems. Our planet supports seven billion people expected to be 9 billion by 2050.”

“We emphasize the importance of culture for sustainable development. We call for a holistic approach to sustainable development which will guide humanity to live in harmony with nature.”
The new United Nations Rio +20 conference in June 2012 will demand:
Universal access and right to information and communications technology
Poverty eradication
Integration of local governments into all levels of decision making in sustainable development
The need to reflect the views of children and youth
No new trade barriers
No new conditions on aid and finance No subsidies
Green technology in the public domain for all to share
Global policy framework requiring all listed and large private companies to integrate sustainability information within UN required reporting cycles
Move the entire world to low-carbon development
The UN-established specialized agency for the environment with universal membership should be located in Nairobi Regular review of the state of the planet and Earth’s carrying capacity
Global trade should be regulated by World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organization, and regional development banks
Development and implementation of integrated water resource management
Efficient human settlements
Restoration and enhancement of natural capital Sustainable land and water management practices
Family farming, ecological farming, organic production systems
Sustainable forest management Rational use of biodiversity for economic purposes
New markets linked to renewable and unconventional energy sources
Green job creation/green economy
Promote education for sustainable development

It looks like the greenologists and the third world dictators at the UN have a lot of work to do between now and June, determining how to better steal our wealth, technology, to indoctrinate impressionable youth into the religion of Gaia, and replenish their bank accounts with U.S. and western money and economic aid under the “wise” United Nations global governance and the guise of eradicating poverty.

Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh ( Romanian Conservative) is a freelance writer (Canada Free Press, Romanian Conservative), author, radio commentator, and speaker.  website, ileanajohnson.com.
Dr. Johnson can be reached at: ileana@canadafreepress.com

______________________________________________________________

Related Articles

SD21: The new Agenda 21 plan to roll out at RIO+20 Summit in June


SD 21: An ominous updated plan by the United Nations


Rio Principles lead way to implementation of SD 21 in U.S.


UN Carbon Map just released from Earth Summit in Rio!


HERE IS THE NEW AGENDA 21 PLAN - NOW CALLED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY  (SD21)

Read this 412 page document directly below

Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles
Detailed review of implementation of Agenda 21
January 2012 DRAFT


Hey If You Are Going Nuts, Why Not Go All In? The tab for U.N.’s Rio summit: Trillions per year in new taxes, transfers and price hikes


The tab for U.N.’s Rio summit: Trillions per year in taxes, transfers and price hikes


Britain to urge green accounting at Rio+20 summit



The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD), better known as the Rio Earth Summit or Rio+20, in Brazil on 20-22 June 2012 will change our world

Read what they have planned below

Rio ZeroDraft Jan2012

Charles declares Mumbai shanty town model for the  world
February 6, 2009

The Mumbai shanty town featured in the film Slumdog Millionaire offers
a better model than does  western architecture for ways to house a booming urban
population in the  developing world, Prince Charles said  yesterday. 

Radio Shows of Maggie Roddin and The Unsolicited Opinion

 FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has  not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is made available for public research and educational purposes.  Full text of articles have been included rather than a simple  link because they frequently disappear,  go dead or change over  time.  It is my belief this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material  as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.  In accordance with Title  17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without fee or  payment of any kind to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving  the included information for research and educational purposes.  If you wish to  use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond  'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.